Monday, May 30, 2011

Researcher Paper

Natalie Grimes
ENG 101
Prof. McCormick


Benefits of Vertical Farming

            Think about having 30-story buildings in Manhattan filled with different types of fruits
and vegetables on every floor. Interesting isn’t it? Professor Dickson Despommier also seems to
think it’s a great idea for the future in agriculture. In his book “The Vertical Farm: Feeding The
World in the 21st Century he goes further into detail about this interesting idea.
   
Vertical Farming is a relatively new experiment that is supposed to take over the U.S. by
2050. Despommier is behind this project and feels that it would be a better way of living. This
idea has caught many architects attention in the United States and Europe. Vertical Farming is
basically vertically shaped greenhouses that are 30 stories tall supplied with growing produce
that are made to feed about 50,000 people. It would cost about 20 to $30 million dollars to build
one of these prototypes. Despommier feels that unless this agricultural change is made then there
will be one of the biggest catastrophes in the farming history in the United States. His theory is
that soil will be depleted and it will put a great strain on our water resources which will lead to a
huge famine in America.
           
Cities are already known to have the density and the basic foundation to support vertical
farms.  Scott M. Stringer, the Manhattan borough president, thinks this would be a great addition
to the NYC skyline. Even though Manhattan doesn’t have much space for these experimental
buildings, in the sky is the limit. Roughly 150 buildings will be built which would be able to feed
New York for a year. The construction and energy costs would make vertically grown crops
more costly than traditional crops. Urban farms cold defray some of their own expense by cutting
transportation costs. Rice and wheat would still have to be grown outdoors so sunlight wouldn’t
have to be paid for and also farmers would have to get better at marginal farming. This project is
still being researched and Despommier estimates that it would take a group of agricultural
economists, architects, engineers, agronomists, and urban planners five to ten years to figure out
how to operate such high-tech practices.
            Maybe vertical farming is not such a bad idea after all since our agricultural today is
linked to deforestation, chemical fertilizers, and a host of transportation giving off a lot of carbon
which contributes to our climate change. “Vertical farming could allow food to be grown locally
and sustainably” says Glen Kertz CEO of Valcent which is Tech Company based in El Paso,
Texas where the process is being evaluated. According to him, potted crops grow in rows on
clear vertical panels that rotate on a conveyor belt. Moving them on the conveyor belt allows the
plant to receive the right amount of light and nutrients needed to grow 15 times as much lettuce
per acre as on a normal farm using 5% of water that regular agriculture does.
            Everyone does not agree with Despommier. Critics like Bruce Bugbee, a professor of
crop psychology at Utah State University believes improvements in how future farm lands are
managed Is more practical and cost of effective. Bugbee’s main objection is the massive cost of
power for such structures. In Arizona Mr. Despommier finds someone who is on his side because
they have 265 acre euro farms, which are thriving with hydroponic tomatoes and seedless
cucumbers. Gene Giacomelli feels that Despommier may be extreme but the idea is worth
considering. Bugbee believes that some farming may lead toward more control environments
especially for crops like fresh herbs but the majority such as wheat and rice has to be done
outside where the levels of sunlight are higher in the summer.
            In the article “Vertical Farming in the windy city” by Christina Couch it states that in
Chicago’s meat–packing district, developer John Edel hopes to reinvent the urban food supply
with a $4 million, far-story indoor produce and fish farm called “The Plant”. Edel and his
colleagues have already planted 3,000 square feet of hydroponic grown lettuce and other greens
and installed 1,400 of tilapia in tanks. The Plant is part of a growing push to bring farms into
metropolitan areas. According to analysis from Iowa State University conventional produce
travels about 1,500 miles on a average to its destination, causing the release of 5 to 17 times
more carbon dioxide than food from regional and local farms, Stan Cox, a plant-breeding
researcher at the Land Institute in Kansas point a out that while leafy vegetables grow fairly well
indoors, stalks like wheat and corn require far more light energy. The fish farm and gardens are
connected by a 9,000 gallon water circulation system: waste water from the tilapia tanks, rich in
nitrogen based nutrients, flows into the hydroponic beds, where it irrigates and fertilizes the
lettuce.
   
In the Canadian Business Magazine, “The Future Is Hungry” it talks of an urban sprawl
encroaches on the world’s arable land and environmental disasters send food prices soaring,
innovators are seeking to take agricultural off the farm. In the wake of hooding in Australia,
droughts in Russia and uprisings in North Africa, food prices hit a record high in January, and
experts predict it’s only going to get worse. Cultivating crops in skyscrapers might save a lot of
energy and provide city dwellers with distinctively fresh food. A vertical farm would drastically
reduce the fossil-fuel use and emissions associated with farm machinery and trucking, as the end
of one season, multiplying wastewater into irrigation water, reducing a city’s refuse problem. 
  

NASA has thought of crops that would grow by dangling in the air infused with a mist of
nutrients and water vapor. The fertilizer and duel consumed for traditional farming is also too
expensive. New York City produces 1.4 billion gallons of liquid waste every day according to
the city reports.  Develops that are designing sustainable eco-cities are talking to Despommier
about vertical farming and other appealing promises of more environmentally sound food
production. The Government also pays out billions of dollars annually to rescue farmers who
lose crops to droughts and floods. Most scientists believe that it is logical to combine a
greenhouse with a power generation plant that burns natural gas, biomass fuel or even trash from
the city. One system will compromise a power-generation plant with an engine and electric
generator. One will be used for growing the fruits and vegetables. The greenhouses will always
later results in releasing oxygen into the atmosphere.
           
In the article from the “Futurist” magazine it explains that The Farm Project supposedly
envisions the transformation of urban architecture along ecological principals. One advantage of 
raising food crops and animals indoors and in closer proximity to customers include year-round
production. It would be more efficient use and reuse of water and other resources and protection
from threats ranging from epidemics to terrorists. How farming is taken care of now will affect
the future in a way because of how many resources we are using. It’s costing us millions to keep
traditional farming and to ship to food across the country to different supermarkets and
restaurants. Even though it would take millions to build a prototype of vertical farm but it would
be able to save us money in the future, the only down side is that food prices would skyrocket
but I think it’s worth the risk. It would better than having the world’s worst famine of the
century. When more research is done on how these things will be designed and built it’s worth a
try.
            Could vertical farming be the answer to feeding ourselves within the next twenty years?
Could this happen in New York? I believe that vertical farming would be beneficial to New York
citizens in a way that we would not have to rely on food to come from a long distance and other
countries. We would be able to manage our own health and what we eat. These are all things we
should think about when it comes to our future.
                                                                         



                                                       

                                                                    Works Citied

Couch, Christina. “Vertical Farming: In the Windy City” Discover 02747529 (2011) vol. 32, Issue 4.Print.
Fishchetti, Mark “Growing Vertical” Scientific American. 1551299 (2008) Special Edition Vol. 18 Issue 4.Print.
Mendleson, Rachel “The Future is Hungry” Canadian Business, 00083100 (2011) Vol.84 Issue 4.print.
Vetataraman, Bina “Country, the City Version: Farms in the Sky Gain New Interest. New York Times  15 July 2008. Web. 2 May 2011
Walsh, Bryan” Vertical Farming” TIME.11 Dec 2008.Web.3 May 2011

For more info you can check out the Vertical Farm website.

Sunday, May 8, 2011

Annoated bibliography

                                                        Annotated Bibliography
                                                              Natalie Grimes

Vertical Farming -  A new form of agriculture that was brainstormed by a professor from Columbia University who goes by the name of the name of Dickson Despommier. He believes transforming skyscrapers into farms would help reduce the impact of global warming.

Despommier, Dickson Dr. The Vertical Farm. New York: Thomas Dunne Books, 2010. Print.
Dr. Despommier, a Columbia professor demonstrates and explains how vertical farming would be established in the future. It paints a picture of what the food system would be like in the year 2050. It is estimated by that time 80% of earth’s population will depend on urban centers.

Chamberlin, Lisa. “Sky farming: Turning Skyscrapers into Crop Farms”. New York Magazine 1 April
2007. Print. 
          This article gets more into detail about this project. It gives visual images, gives a list of operations and a full description of how these buildings will be designed. It makes observations of how mostly the cities are the most stable to obtain these vertical crops.

Walsh, Bryan. “Vertical Farming”. TIME 11Dec 2008. Print.
This TIME article further goes into the financial part of building thee crops. Construction costs and energy costs would be more costly than traditional crops. A question was asked “Why would we want to build skyscrapers filled with lettuce when we’ve been farming on ground for 10, 000 years?” The answer was that the population is growing. 6.8 billion Is the population number right now? It is estimated that in the year 2050 it will reach to 9 billion. There’s also a possibility that if we don’t take action on this project we could run out of soil and water.
Nelson, Bryan. “Could Vertical Farming be the Future?”. MSNBC 12 Dec 2007.Print.

Utah State University researchers have developed ways to withheld heat in the ground and to help the growth of certain foods by season. The cost of food will rise because of the environment it’ll be stored in and the way the crop plants will be operating. Even though transportation costs will be cut the amount of money to pay for the food will increase.
Venkataraman, Bina. “Country, the city version: Farms in the sky Gain New Interest”. New York Times 15 July 2008:Print.
Scott M. Stringer who is the Manhattan borough president agreed with the idea. Even thought he say we don’t have much vacant land sky is the limit in Manhattan. These structures are built to feed 50,000 people. Even though everyone is excited for this new there is still a lot of research to be done.
Despommier, Dickson Dr. Vertical Farm 14 Oct 2010. YouTube.Web.


In this video is dickson despommier himself who is also the author of the book "The Vertical Farm". He gives a breif expanation of vertical farming and this video also gives a visual demonstration of how the crops and buildings would be made and establsihed.

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

4/26/11 class writing

In my opinion banning soda purchases with foood stamps would effect the majority of americans and people who depend on food stamps to be able to eat everyday. Knowing that most people can't afford any othe rhealthier drinks soda is the only thing that's resonable. If they band food stamps then most citizens would have to spend moer money on buying other drinks whic h are more expensive. I agree with Julie Guthman when she says that before thinking about banning the food stamps think about banning the high fructose corn syrup and unhealthy ingredients in the food......

Monday, April 25, 2011

Response to Chp.2 "Fats Food Nation" and "Super Size Me"

In the book "Fast Food Nation" chapter 2 it explains the origin in which McDonalds came from. It mentions

the Ray A. Koc museum which was named after the man who founded the McDonalds corporation. It gives

the history and the journey that Mcdonalds made to become what it is today. In the movie "Super Size Me" it

makes similiar points. The man who did the 30 day challenge I think put his life at a huge risk just to prove a

point. I dont think I would ever have the guts to do the same but I appreciate the fact that he did it anyway

and it gave me a better view of what mcDonalds can do to you and how it effects you're body. Even me

personally Ive restrained myself from in-taking unhealthy foods and even mcDonalds and i have felt much

better physically and mentally. Sometimes i wonder if McDonalds resurant was to shut down or was never

establsihed what would america do?....

          Maybe people would see it as a good thing because there's no secret of what the food industry is

doing. In my opinion i think the movie and book were great warnings to american citizens but still no matter

how much things are said, articles are printed and movies are made about this topic most likely nothing is

bound to change.

Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Self-Analysis

1) The first paragraph introduces the paper"s topic very clearly.it syas what's going to be further explained in the paper and the conclusion comments quite well. The first sentence is highly relevent to the topic because it mentions the correct time period and has a happy beginning.

2) I feel that the thesis is rather strong and gives a good introduction.

3) I can identify organization of each topic. The main concepts are basicallly comparing and contrasting two time periods. Some more points can be made other than what"s written and the writer can elaborate more on some of the ingredients.

4) Not much mistakes with grammar. Everything was explained formally and no arkward sentneces.

5) Sources are well identified and in proper text.

6) The strenghts of this writer in this essay is that very strong points were made each topic was very detailed and relevant to everyhing else in the essay. Vocabulary could use some more improvement.

Tuesday, March 29, 2011

5 Sources of Research

Articles- 1)The Dirty Dozen by Tracey Rohland
               http://www.downtoearth.org/
              2) http://www.watersystemcouncil.org/
              3) http://www.truthinlabeling.org/
           * This breaks down what exactly pesticides are and it helps me to undertsand how it affects the
               human body. It also breaks down the form and how they are used in argriculture.
Books- 1)W.D. Lynch- " Poisonous Metals on Sprayed Fruits and Vegetables"
             2) Fast Food Nation- Pg. 264 (eggs)
                 Pg.204 (Milk Production)

Wednesday, March 23, 2011

feedback on "FOOD INC."

Today in professor McCormick's class we watched we a documentary on the

food industry called "FOOD INC". I found it very interesting and it made alot of

good points. It also made me thing about how I eat and my diet and made me

think if i should change some things. Some of the farmers who are paid to do

what they do i wonder how they feel about being part of such an organization.

Personally I don't think I could live with doing that for the rest of my life . I

would feel some kind of guilt knowing I was doing such a thing to animals and

also causing a disruption to the healthn of humans. Being enslaved to a

company in this situation to me is like being obligated to kill people or cause

diseases and extreme health problems. One thing I didnt know is that chickens

grow in about 3 months or so and with they're method it grows in about 49

days. I don't care how much money I would get I wouldn't want to be enslaved

by a company to do wrong and harm the health of animlas and humans. I felt

sorry for the mother who lost her child. I would have so mcuh anger for the

people who produce contaminated fod not caring who it harmed. I admire her

for trying to fight for her right because of what happened to her son. My

favorite person from the documentary wwas the farmer who's name i can't

recall but he raised his animals naturally. I think he was a strong person he

tried his best to keep his farm open and functioning well. He had a desire to

produced  good and healthy food not only for him but for the people who

brought from him.He felt good about what he was doing and that it was the

right thing whichi do agree. Even though companies and others tried to shut

him downhe didnt let that phase him. He believed in eating right and if we are

to eat meat to make sure it was good enough to intake. This film also insipired

me to encourage others to eat better for themsleves watch what they ptu into

their bodies. As for me i wwill watch my diet more because after watching that

it turned my mind form eating meat. This also helped me to be wise of what

goes on in this food industry because who knows  what's next.